From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smocum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 2001
286 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(IND. NO. 12496/97)

Argued September 4, 2001.

September 24, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered May 6, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Andrew C. Fine, New York, N.Y. (Kristina Ross of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Michael Gore of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, no Batson violation occurred during jury selection (see, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79). The Supreme Court properly determined that the race-neutral explanation proffered by the prosecutor for the challenge was not merely pretextual (see, People v. Payne, 88 N.Y.2d 172; People v. Allen, 86 N.Y.2d 101).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, LUCIANO and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Smocum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 2001
286 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Smocum

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. JOHN SMOCUM, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 24, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 719

Citing Cases

Torres v. Educational Alliance, Inc.

After the defendants provided facially-neutral reasons for rejecting the challenged jurors (see People v.…