From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 30, 2020
189 A.D.3d 1618 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2016–07008 Ind. No. 10308/14

12-30-2020

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Carl B. SMITH, appellant.

Carl B. Smith, Rome, NY, appellant pro se. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jean M. Joyce of counsel), for respondent.


Carl B. Smith, Rome, NY, appellant pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jean M. Joyce of counsel), for respondent.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 17, 2019 ( People v. Smith, 171 A.D.3d 1101, 97 N.Y.S.3d 281 [2019] ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 13, 2016.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 [1983] ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 [2004] ).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., ROMAN, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 30, 2020
189 A.D.3d 1618 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Carl B. Smith…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 1618 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 8085
135 N.Y.S.3d 313