From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 12, 2020
188 A.D.3d 1357 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

110863

11-12-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jason S. SMITH, Appellant.

Veronica Reed, Schenectady, for appellant. Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M. Hollis of counsel), for respondent.


Veronica Reed, Schenectady, for appellant.

Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M. Hollis of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lynch, J.P., Mulvey, Devine, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Mulvey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), rendered October 22, 2018, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the first degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment stemming from the robbery of a liquor store, defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree and agreed to waive his right to appeal. He was sentenced as a second felony offender, in accordance with the plea agreement, to a prison term of 20 years, followed by five years of postrelease supervision, to be served consecutively with a prior undischarged sentence. Defendant appeals.

Defendant's only contentions on appeal are that the waiver of the right to appeal was invalid and that the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered. Regardless of whether the appeal waiver is valid, defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of the guilty plea would survive any such waiver (see People v. Simon, 166 A.D.3d 1075, 1076, 86 N.Y.S.3d 333 [2018] ). Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of the plea, however, is unpreserved for our review as the record does not reflect that an appropriate postallocution motion was made and the narrow exception to the preservation rule is not implicated by any statements made during the plea colloquy (see People v. Gonzalez, 184 A.D.3d 899, 899, 123 N.Y.S.3d 549 [2020] ; People v. Berkman, 184 A.D.3d 898, 898, 123 N.Y.S.3d 548 [2020] ; People v. Martin, 179 A.D.3d 1385, 1386–1387, 114 N.Y.S.3d 889 [2020] ). As such, the judgment of conviction will not be disturbed.

Lynch, J.P., Devine, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 12, 2020
188 A.D.3d 1357 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jason S. Smith…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 12, 2020

Citations

188 A.D.3d 1357 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
188 A.D.3d 1357
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 6415

Citing Cases

People v. Haynes

Defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his plea was not knowing,…

People v. Jean-Pierre

Despite any reservations that we may have concerning the imposition of the enhanced sentence, his request…