From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1996
227 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 31, 1996

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, McCarthy, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney was compelled to take a position adverse to him ( cf., People v. Welsh, 207 A.D.2d 1025, 1026). Defense counsel made no comment adverse to defendant during the Outley hearing ( see, People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702). He confirmed that defendant had called his office on the scheduled date of sentencing, and he supported the explanation proffered by defendant concerning possible danger that defendant might suffer if he appeared in court. Defense counsel urged the court to impose the sentence initially promised. Under the circumstances, the voluntary statement of defense counsel regarding the efforts of his office to locate defendant and the accessibility of his office for messages, made after the court had decided to impose an enhanced sentence, did not deprive defendant of meaningful assistance. Finally, we have reviewed defendant's remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1996
227 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICKY SMITH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 31, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 290

Citing Cases

People v. Goncalves

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his guilty plea was not voluntarily, knowingly and…