From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 1996
226 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 15, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim of error pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79) was never presented to the trial court as specifically based on a combination of race and gender. Thus, the defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the trial court erred by finding that the defense had not established a prima facie case of discrimination by the prosecution in its use of peremptory challenges against African-American men ( see, People v. Stephens, 84 N.Y.2d 990; People v. Ramos, 223 A.D.2d 565). Moreover, we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Santucci, J.P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 1996
226 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TOMMY SMITH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 550