Opinion
October 13, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.).
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentencing court has complied with the mandates of Penal Law § 70.10 (2) and adequately set forth on the record the reasons why it was of the opinion that the history and character of the defendant and the nature and circumstances of his criminal conduct indicate that extended incarceration and lifetime supervision will best serve the public interest ( see, People v. Corrica, 243 A.D.2d 722; People v. Smith, 232 A.D.2d 586; People v. Dell'Orfano, 197 A.D.2d 587; People v. Gaines, 136 A.D.2d 731, 733).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.