From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1973
42 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

October 15, 1973


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 27, 1972, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate prison term not to exceed seven years. Judgment reversed, on the law, and case remanded to the Criminal Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. At the time of the change of plea to one of guilty, the trial court, before accepting it, elicited information from defendant which cast doubt upon his guilt of the crime to which he offered to plead guilty or of any other crime. Accordingly, the court was obligated to so inform defendant and explain his right to go to trial ( People v. Serrano, 15 N.Y.2d 304; People v. Crawley, 42 A.D.2d 586). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1973
42 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FREDERICK SMITH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1973

Citations

42 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

People v. Donis

Such inconsistent statements tended to cast doubt upon defendant's guilt and accordingly, the court should…

People v. Diaz

05, subds. 2, 3). The information elicited from him at the time of the change of plea and the testimony at…