From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 1998
254 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 8, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.).


The court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea since the record established that the plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent "and since defendant, after being afforded the opportunity to orally present his claims, failed to support his claims of coercion with anything other than conclusory allegations ( see, People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520; People v. Vasquez, 242 A.D.2d 452). We also find that there was no reason to appoint new counsel ( People v. Senghor, 248 A.D.2d 299). We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 8, 1998
254 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIKAL SMITH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 8, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 496