From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 9, 1996
227 A.D.2d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 9, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.).


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Defendant's use or threatened immediate use of a dangerous instrument (Penal Law § 160.15) was established by evidence that he "swished" a knife during a struggle with the complainant and his brother, after defendant picked the complainant's pocket and as the complainant recovered the stolen money from defendant's grasp ( see, People v. Fields, 179 A.D.2d 458, lv withdrawn 79 N.Y.2d 947). Credibility issues were properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its verdict.

The sentence imposed was not excessive in light of defendant's criminal history, which was correctly characterized by the sentencing court as an "increasing pattern of violence" in defendant's theft-related crimes.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 9, 1996
227 A.D.2d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY SMITH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 9, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 249

Citing Cases

The State of New York v. James Kadarko

With respect to the contention that the sentence is unduly harsh, we note that defendant, who was 27 years…