From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2007
41 A.D.3d 1093 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 16428.

June 28, 2007.

Crew III, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered July 8, 2005, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of kidnapping in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

Theresa M. Suozzi, Saratoga Springs, for appellant, and appellant prose.

John R. Trice, District Attorney, Elmira, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters and Carpinello, JJ.


On February 5, 2005, while at a shopping mall, defendant opened the passenger side door of the victim's car, brandished a knife and directed her to drive away. During the ensuing trip which took them to portions of Chemung County and Pennsylvania, defendant took in excess of $1,500 from the victim's checking and credit card accounts. As a consequence, defendant was indicted and charged with kidnapping in the second degree, robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of kidnapping in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree for which he was sentenced to, among other things, 25 years of imprisonment with five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals and we affirm.

Initially, we reject defendant's contention that his conviction was not supported by legally sufficient evidence and was against the weight of the evidence. Quite clearly, the victim's testimony constituted "competent evidence which, if accepted as true, would establish every element of [the] offense charged" (CPL 70.10). Moreover, giving due deference to the jury's credibility determinations, the weight of the evidence clearly supports the verdict rendered. We have considered defendant's remaining contentions, including those in his pro se briefs, and find them equally without merit.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2007
41 A.D.3d 1093 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GLEN S. SMITH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 1093 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5596
839 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

Smith v. Lempke

In addition, petitioner filed a pro se supplemental brief, in which he raised the following claims: (1) the…

People v. Wertman

In any event, defendant's challenge is without merit. “[T]he victim's testimony constituted ‘competent…