From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 2009
67 A.D.3d 1392 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2005-06936.

November 13, 2009.

Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Michael F. Pietruszka, J.), entered February 11, 2009. The order granted defendant's motion to suppress certain evidence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan M. Kratter of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Howard B. Goodman of counsel), for respondent.

Present: Hurlbutt, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed and the indictment is dismissed.

Memorandum: The People appeal from an order granting defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized as the result of a traffic stop. We conclude that County Court properly suppressed the evidence on the ground that the police officer made a mistake of law in stopping defendant's vehicle, which had in fact performed a legal pass on the right pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1123 (a) (1) and (2). "Where the officer's belief is based on an erroneous interpretation of law, the stop is illegal at the outset and any further actions by the police as a direct result of the stop are illegal" ( Matter of Byer v Jackson, 241 AD2d 943, 944-945; see People v Smith, 1 AD3d 965; see also People v Gonzalez, 88 NY2d 289, 295-296).


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 2009
67 A.D.3d 1392 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. LARRY SMITH, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 1392 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7445
887 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

People v. Maeshack

The Court found that the police officer's belief that he observed a traffic violation was objectively…