From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1997
245 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 22, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.).


Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and report on the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was denied the right to a speedy retrial, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Kings County, is to file its report with all convenient speed.

Following the declaration of a mistrial, the defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was denied his right to a speedy retrial. Inasmuch as the defendant sustained his initial burden of alleging an unexcused delay in excess of six months between the date that the mistrial was ordered and the date of his retrial ( see, CPL 30.30), and the People's opposition raised factual disputes but did not conclusively refute the defendant's claim with "unquestionable documentary proof" (CPL 210.45 [c]), this matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing on the defendant's motion ( see, CPL 210.45; People v. Santos, 68 N.Y.2d 859, 861; People v. Wilson, 188 A.D.2d 671, 672).

We pass on no other issues at this juncture.

Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and Lerner, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1997
245 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. ANTHONY SMITH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 44

Citing Cases

People v. Rousaw

The People accordingly "show[ed] that there is a factual dispute" in response to defendant's claims (People v…