From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 1997
245 A.D.2d 23 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 4, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Collins, J.).


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues concerning the reliability of identification evidence were properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its findings. Defendant's acquittal of certain counts does not undermine the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting the counts upon which he was convicted.

Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record ( see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761). Given these determinations, we conclude that the People established the voluntariness of the confession beyond a reasonable doubt.

Nothing in the record suggests that the sentence was based on any impermissible criteria, and we perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Tom, Mazzarelli and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 1997
245 A.D.2d 23 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. FRANK SMITH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 4, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 23 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 866

Citing Cases

People v. Ramos

We reject defendant's related claim that this portion of the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.…