From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Small

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1937
249 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Summary

In People v. Small (249 App. Div. 863, affd. 274 N.Y. 551) the interrupted acts of seizure of the victims, as far as they went, suggested kidnapping and no purpose to rob was established.

Summary of this case from People v. Levy

Opinion

January 29, 1937.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ.


Judgment of the County Court of Kings county, convicting defendant of the crime of kidnapping and assault in the second degree, and order denying his motion for a new trial, unanimously affirmed. No opinion.


Summaries of

People v. Small

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1937
249 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

In People v. Small (249 App. Div. 863, affd. 274 N.Y. 551) the interrupted acts of seizure of the victims, as far as they went, suggested kidnapping and no purpose to rob was established.

Summary of this case from People v. Levy
Case details for

People v. Small

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE SMALL, True…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1937

Citations

249 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

People v. Stuckey

The issue thus presented is whether the foregoing facts are sufficient to sustain a conviction of kidnapping…

People v. Levy

People v. Black ( supra), as we have noted, involved clearly separate crimes of robbery and kidnapping. In…