From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Small

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 2004
7 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-02447.

Decided May 24, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), rendered March 13, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, SANDRA L. TOWNES, STEPHEN G. CRANE, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's argument that the sentencing court should have granted him youthful offender treatment is unpreserved for appellate review, since he failed to object or to move to withdraw his plea on this ground ( see People v. Bermudez, 177 A.D.2d 323). In any event, under the circumstances of this case, the denial of youthful offender treatment was a provident exercise of discretion.

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suite, 80 A.D.2d 90).

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, TOWNES, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Small

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 2004
7 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Small

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. TYRONE SMALL, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
776 N.Y.S.2d 809

Citing Cases

State v. Pinheiro

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that the sentencing court should have…

People v. Thompson

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed. The defendant's contention that the court improvidently exercised…