From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sloan

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento
Oct 28, 2024
No. C095622 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 28, 2024)

Opinion

C095622

10-28-2024

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARVIN SLOAN, Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. No. 03F00743

OPINION ON TRANSFER

MESIWALA, J.

Marvin Sloan appeals from the trial court's order finding that he qualified as a sexually violent predator (SVP) and committing him to the State Department of State Hospitals (Department of State Hospitals). He contends the trial court erred in allowing the People to use a retained expert to testify at trial.

We initially agreed with Sloan, reversed the trial court's order, and remanded for a new trial. Our Supreme Court granted review and transferred the matter back to us to reconsider in light of People v. Needham (2024) 16 Cal.5th 333. Upon that reconsideration, we change our position and affirm the order finding Sloan qualified as an SVP and committing him to the Department of State Hospitals.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Sacramento County District Attorney filed a petition to commit Sloan as an SVP (Welf. &Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) in November 2018, and the trial court permitted the People to retain Dr. Craig King as an expert. Dr. King testified at Sloan's SVP court trial that began in October 2021. Following the parties' posttrial briefings, the trial court issued an order finding that Sloan qualified as an SVP and committing him to the Department of State Hospitals. Sloan timely appealed.

DISCUSSION

Sloan contends the trial court erred in permitting Dr. King to testify at his trial because the People have no right under the SVPA to retain a testifying expert. The California Supreme Court recently rejected that contention in Needham, and we are bound by that holding. (Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455.) Under Needham, "[t]he People's qualified expert may testify and give an opinion as to whether the defendant meets the statutory definition of an SVP." (People v. Needham, supra, 16 Cal.5th at p. 369.) Thus, the trial court did not err in allowing the People to use Dr. King as their retained expert to testify at trial.

DISPOSITION

The order finding Sloan qualified as an SVP and committing him to the Department of State Hospitals is affirmed.

We concur: DUARTE, Acting P. J., BOULWARE EURIE, J.


Summaries of

People v. Sloan

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento
Oct 28, 2024
No. C095622 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 28, 2024)
Case details for

People v. Sloan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARVIN SLOAN, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento

Date published: Oct 28, 2024

Citations

No. C095622 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 28, 2024)