From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Skinner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1108 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Appeal from the Erie County Court, Drury, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Following the admission by defendant that he violated three conditions of his probation, County Court revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of 1 2/3 to 5 years' imprisonment without first ordering an updated presentence investigation report. Although CPL 390.20 (1) requires a presentence investigation report when a sentence is imposed upon a felony conviction, where, as here, the court is fully familiar with any changes in defendant's status, conduct or condition since the original report was prepared, an updated report is not required (see, People v. Hemingway, 222 A.D.2d 1102 [decided herewith]; People v. Reaves, 216 A.D.2d 945, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 801; People v. Shattuck, 214 A.D.2d 1026, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 740; People v. Brand, 138 A.D.2d 966, 967, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 966). We find no abuse of discretion in the court's determination not to order an updated presentence investigation report (see, People v. Kuey, 83 N.Y.2d 278).

Lastly, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. Skinner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1108 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Skinner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PETER C. SKINNER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1108 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 896

Citing Cases

People v. Wright

The court did not err in sentencing defendant without the benefit of an updated presentence investigation…

People v. Sinclair

We also reject the contention that County Court erred in sentencing defendant without the benefit of an…