From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. SITZ

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Jan 28, 1913
21 Cal.App. 54 (Cal. Ct. App. 1913)

Opinion

Crim. No. 267.

January 28, 1913.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County and from an order denying a new trial. Paul W. Bennett, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Joseph H. Tam, for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and George Beebe, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


Defendant was convicted of the crime of obtaining money under false pretenses, the judgment of the court being that he be imprisoned in the state prison for the term of five years. He appealed from the judgment and an order of court denying his motion for a new trial; and upon the issuance of a writ of probable cause he was remanded to the custody of the sheriff pending the hearing of his appeal. Thereafter, and during the pendency of his appeal, as shown by the affidavit of the sheriff, he escaped from custody and thence to the hearing of his appeal has remained at large. Upon the authority of People v. Redinger, 55 Cal. 290, [36 Am. Rep. 32], and People v. Elkins, 122 Cal. 654, [55 P. 599], the attorney-general has moved to dismiss the appeal. That defendant escaped from the lawful custody of the sheriff and is now at large conclusively appears from the affidavit filed in support of the motion.

The case is identical with those above cited, and upon the authority thereof it is ordered that, unless defendant shall within thirty days from the date of the filing hereof surrender to the custody of the sheriff of Kern County, his appeal herein shall, without further order, stand dismissed.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. SITZ

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Jan 28, 1913
21 Cal.App. 54 (Cal. Ct. App. 1913)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. SITZ

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BERNARD C. SITZ, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Jan 28, 1913

Citations

21 Cal.App. 54 (Cal. Ct. App. 1913)
130 P. 858

Citing Cases

State v. Spry

Frequently an order is made directing that the writ of error be dismissed at the expiration of a time, fixed…

People v. Marroquin

We agree with the Attorney General that given defendant's fugitive status, his appeal should be dismissed.…