From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sira

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1998
254 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 5, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The police lawfully stopped the vehicle in which the defendant was a passenger upon observing various traffic infractions ( see, People v. Ellis, 62 N.Y.2d 393; Matter of Marcellius H.R., 229 A.D.2d 578). There is no basis for concluding that the officers used the traffic infractions as a mere pretext to investigate unrelated criminal activity ( see, People v. Gales, 187 A.D.2d 606). Under the circumstances, the officer's direction to the defendant to exit the vehicle was a permissible and appropriate precautionary measure ( see, People v. Robinson, 74 N.Y.2d 773, cert denied 493 U.S. 966; Matter of Marcellius H.R., supra; People v. Rosario, 94 A.D.2d 329). The officer was justified in retrieving the law enforcement badge which he observed on the floor of the vehicle as the defendant exited and had probable cause to arrest the defendant when he then observed a gun. Because the stop and arrest were proper, the subsequent recovery of 62 kilograms of cocaine from the vehicle, pursuant to a search warrant, was lawful. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant had knowledge of the weight of the cocaine ( see, People v. Gonzales, 235 A.D.2d 493; People v. Dillon, 207 A.D.2d 793, 797, affd 87 N.Y.2d 885).

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. An examination of the criminal proceedings in their entirety reveals that the defendant received meaningful and effective representation ( see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sira

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1998
254 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Sira

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUBIN SIRA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 101

Citing Cases

Sira v. Morton

REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellee Rubin Sira, who is presently incarcerated by the State of New…

People v. McKane

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the police properly stopped…