From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Singleton-Pradia

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 15, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

210 KA 17–00128

03-15-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brendyn J. SINGLETON-PRADIA, also known as Brendyn Singleton, Defendant-Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree ( Penal Law § 220.16[1] ) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (§ 220.09[1] ). We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in failing to determine whether he should be afforded youthful offender status (see People v. Rudolph, 21 N.Y.3d 497, 501, 974 N.Y.S.2d 885, 997 N.E.2d 457 [2013] ; People v. Willis, 161 A.D.3d 1584, 1584, 77 N.Y.S.3d 259 [4th Dept. 2018] ). Defendant is an eligible youth and, as the People correctly concede, the sentencing court must make "a youthful offender determination in every case where the defendant is eligible, even where the defendant fails to request it" ( Rudolph, 21 N.Y.3d at 501, 974 N.Y.S.2d 885, 997 N.E.2d 457 ; see People v. Lester, 155 A.D.3d 1579, 1579, 65 N.Y.S.3d 614 [4th Dept. 2017] ). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to Supreme Court to make and state for the record a determination whether defendant should be afforded youthful offender status (see Rudolph, 21 N.Y.3d at 503, 974 N.Y.S.2d 885, 997 N.E.2d 457 ; Lester, 155 A.D.3d at 1579, 65 N.Y.S.3d 614 ).


Summaries of

People v. Singleton-Pradia

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 15, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Singleton-Pradia

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brendyn J…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 15, 2019

Citations

170 A.D.3d 1520 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
170 A.D.3d 1520

Citing Cases

People v. Singleton-Pradia

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Daniel J. Doyle, J.), rendered February 10, 2015.…

People v. Singleton-Pradia

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Daniel J. Doyle, J.), rendered February 10, 2015.…