From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Singletary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 27, 2000.

December 6, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), imposed July 15, 1999.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Ann Bordley of counsel; Vanessa M. Arteaga on the memorandum), for respondent.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal the issue of the alleged excessiveness of his sentence was ineffective (see, People v. Rose [Simon], 236 A.D.2d 637; People v. Rolon, 220 A.D.2d 543). We have considered the defendant's contention that the sentence is excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v. Allen, 269 A.D.2d 534; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).


Summaries of

People v. Singletary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Singletary

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. EUGENE SINGLETARY, APPELLANT. (IND. NO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

People v. Battle

Accordingly, the matter must be remitted for resentencing on both counts of the indictment under which the…