From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Singletary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 8, 1996.

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following.

Before: Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Defendant pleaded guilty to attempted burglary in the first degree. Prior to sentencing, defendant moved, pro se, to withdraw his plea. Defendant's retained counsel sought to withdraw as counsel, making several statements in open court that contradicted factual assertions set forth by defendant on his motion. We conclude that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney became a witness against him ( see, People v Kellar, 213 AD2d 1063; see also, People v Santana, 156 AD2d 736, 737). The court therefore should not have determined the motion of defendant to withdraw his guilty plea without first granting counsel's motion to withdraw and permitting defendant to retain a different attorney to represent him ( see, People v Kellar, supra; People v Welsh, 207 AD2d 1025). Thus, we reserve decision and remit the matter to Onondaga County Court for a de novo determination of the motion of defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty ( see, People v Chrysler, 233 AD2d 928 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, McCarthy, J. — Attempted Burglary, 1st Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Singletary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Singletary

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. Louis SINGLETARY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 567

Citing Cases

People v. Wilder

record also reveals that defendant gave pertinent, appropriate and unequivocal responses to County Court's…

People v. Mckoy

We reject those contentions. With respect to the contentions of defendant concerning the voluntariness of the…