From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1907
121 App. Div. 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

October 4, 1907.

Timothy M. Griffing, for the appellant.

Martin T. Manton, respondent, in person.


The respondent was duly assigned as counsel to defend James W. Simpson, who was indicted in the county of Suffolk for the crime of murder in the first degree. The accused was thereafter tried and acquitted. Subsequently an application was made to the Supreme Court at Special Term by the respondent, upon notice to the district attorney, for an allowance of counsel fees and for his personal and incidental expenses. The application resulted in an order granting to the respondent an allowance in the sum of $500 and certain items of disbursements, including expert fees.

By section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the allowance made to the counsel becomes a charge upon the county, and the order requires the appellant, as county treasurer, to pay the sum allowed. That official was not a party, however, to the motion, nor has he been substituted or made a party in any way. I do not think he has any connection with the case which makes him an aggrieved party within the meaning of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, or that he has any standing authorizing him to take this appeal.

The appeal should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

HOOKER, GAYNOR, RICH and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

People v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1907
121 App. Div. 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

People v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v . JAMES W. SIMPSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1907

Citations

121 App. Div. 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
106 N.Y.S. 45

Citing Cases

People v. Diehl

The first two paragraphs certify and allow the fee and certain disbursements of respondent, assigned counsel…

Matter of Kenney v. Prendergast

Since the granting of the order appealed from, however, that case has been reversed by the Court of Appeals…