From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 4, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that the verdict sheet submitted to the jurors, which contained a direction regarding the order in which the submitted charges should be considered, was in violation of CPL 310.20 (2) and deprived him of a fair trial (see, People v Cole, 85 N.Y.2d 990; People v Daughtry, 202 A.D.2d 686; cf., People v Sotomayer, 79 N.Y.2d 1029).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit. Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHAWN SIMPSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 4, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 47

Citing Cases

People v. Bruce

In this regard, any possible prejudice to the defendant was ameliorated when the Supreme Court sustained…

People v. Bruce

Moreover, neither of the challenged questions deprived the defendant of a fair trial.The defendant's…