From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simpkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1992
186 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 1, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Robert Haft, J., Peter McQuillan, J.


Defendant claims the plea allocution was insufficient to support his plea of guilty. A review of the record reveals that the plea was knowing and voluntary and that defendant's participation in the robbery was sufficiently established (People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v Tollinchi, 157 A.D.2d 495).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Simpkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1992
186 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Simpkins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SEAN SIMPKINS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 163

Citing Cases

Anderson v. Greene

"Where the alleged fraud is merely 'the means of accomplishing the breach and add[s] nothing to the causes of…