From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simpkins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 17, 2012
99 A.D.3d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-10-17

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher SIMPKINS, appellant.

Christopher Simpkins, Comstock, N.Y., appellant pro se. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel), for respondent.


Christopher Simpkins, Comstock, N.Y., appellant pro se. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel), for respondent.

*908Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 15, 2011 ( People v. Simpkins, 81 A.D.3d 860, 916 N.Y.S.2d 834), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 8, 2009.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987;People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883).

FLORIO, J.P., BELEN, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Simpkins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 17, 2012
99 A.D.3d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Simpkins

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher SIMPKINS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 17, 2012

Citations

99 A.D.3d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6980
951 N.Y.S.2d 907