Opinion
February 18, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony is without merit (see, People v Jackson, 180 A.D.2d 756 [decided herewith]).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit (see, People v. Singleton, 72 N.Y.2d 845). Sullivan, J.P., Eiber, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.