From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Silverman, Spevack, Goldis, Schorr

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1938
16 N.E.2d 396 (N.Y. 1938)

Opinion

Argued June 1, 1938

Decided July 7, 1938

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Morris Spevack, Haskel Jacobs and Emanuel Bloch for Benjamin N. Spevack, appellant.

Edward C. Maguire and Edmond B. Butler for William Goldis, appellant.

Louis H. Solomon and Arthur Lubell for Samuel Schorr, appellant.

Sol A. Klein for Harold Silverman, appellant.

Thomas E. Dewey, District Attorney ( Barent Ten Eyck, Felix C. Benvenga and E.G. Stoddard of counsel), for respondent.


As to defendants Spevack, Goldis and Schorr: judgment affirmed. As to defendant Silverman: judgment reversed and information dismissed on the ground that his guilt has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, LOUGHRAN and RIPPEY, JJ.; HUBBS and FINCH, JJ., concur as to Spevack, Goldis and Schorr, but dissent as to Silverman and vote to affirm as to him. Taking no part: CRANE, Ch. J.


Summaries of

People v. Silverman, Spevack, Goldis, Schorr

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1938
16 N.E.2d 396 (N.Y. 1938)
Case details for

People v. Silverman, Spevack, Goldis, Schorr

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HAROLD SILVERMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1938

Citations

16 N.E.2d 396 (N.Y. 1938)
16 N.E.2d 396

Citing Cases

People v. Schildhaus

They were not dismissed or set aside. The papers indicate that the superseding informations were filed on…

People v. Parker

For many purposes, including I think this one, a superseding indictment plays a role in criminal cases…