Opinion
S062417
08-13-2020
Opinion filed: Judgment affirmed in full
Defendants contend the cumulative effect of penalty phase error requires us to reverse the death judgments. We have found error, but no prejudice, in the trial court's instruction to certain penalty retrial prospective jurors in the language of CALJIC No. 1.00. (See ante, pt. II.B.7.b) Likewise, we have assumed error but found no prejudice in other claims raised by defendants. We further conclude that this error and the assumed errors are not prejudicial when considered cumulatively.
For the reasons above, we affirm the judgments.
Majority Opinion by Groban, J.
-- joined by Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.