From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Silveria

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Aug 13, 2020
S062417 (Cal. Aug. 13, 2020)

Opinion

S062417

08-13-2020

PEOPLE v. SILVERIA (DANIEL TODD) & TRAVIS (JOHN RAYMOND)


Opinion filed: Judgment affirmed in full

Defendants contend the cumulative effect of penalty phase error requires us to reverse the death judgments. We have found error, but no prejudice, in the trial court's instruction to certain penalty retrial prospective jurors in the language of CALJIC No. 1.00. (See ante, pt. II.B.7.b) Likewise, we have assumed error but found no prejudice in other claims raised by defendants. We further conclude that this error and the assumed errors are not prejudicial when considered cumulatively.

For the reasons above, we affirm the judgments.

Majority Opinion by Groban, J.

-- joined by Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Silveria

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Aug 13, 2020
S062417 (Cal. Aug. 13, 2020)
Case details for

People v. Silveria

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. SILVERIA (DANIEL TODD) & TRAVIS (JOHN RAYMOND)

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Aug 13, 2020

Citations

S062417 (Cal. Aug. 13, 2020)