From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sigue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 2003
308 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-05787

September 29, 2003.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated December 9, 2002 ( People v. Sigue, 300 A.D.2d 414), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 20, 2001.

Billy Sigue, Dannemora, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Amy Appelbaum, and Tziyonah M. Langsam of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745).

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, GOLDSTEIN and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sigue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 2003
308 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Sigue

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. BILLY SIGUE, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 29, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 255