From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sibert

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 22, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1112 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

04-22-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Dennis SIBERT, appellant.

Martin Geduldig, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant. Madeline Singas, Acting District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Judith R. Sternberg of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.


Martin Geduldig, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant.

Madeline Singas, Acting District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Judith R. Sternberg of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.

Opinion Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), imposed April 18, 2013, upon his conviction of criminal contempt in the first degree (four counts) and stalking in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ). Under the circumstances, the sentencing court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by imposing consecutive sentences (see generally People v. Brown, 80 N.Y.2d 361, 590 N.Y.S.2d 422, 604 N.E.2d 1353 ).

DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, COHEN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sibert

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 22, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1112 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Sibert

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Dennis SIBERT, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 22, 2015

Citations

127 A.D.3d 1112 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 3388
5 N.Y.S.3d 886

Citing Cases

People v. Alcides P.

Thus, the waiver does not preclude review of this excessive sentence claim. However, under the circumstances,…

People v. Alcides P.

Thus, the waiver does not preclude review of this excessive sentence claim. However, under the circumstances,…