From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shutsha

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 23, 2021
199 A.D.3d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

14689 Ind. No. 2869/14 Case No. 2018–03231

11-23-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sekou SHUTSHA, Defendant–Appellant.

Marianne Karas, Thornwood, for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Karl Z. Deuble of counsel), for respondent.


Marianne Karas, Thornwood, for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Karl Z. Deuble of counsel), for respondent.

Kern, J.P., Gesmer, Gonza´lez, Shulman, Higgitt, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Goldberg, J.), rendered September 6, 2018, as amended September 26, 2018, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3½ to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). The jury could have reasonably concluded that even if defendant was behaving irrationally during the incident, he still had the intent to use a scissors unlawfully against other persons, at least for the purpose of committing the crime of menacing.

Defendant's challenge to the court's response to a jury note is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal.

Defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims are unreviewable on direct appeal because they involve matters of strategy not reflected in, or fully explained by, the record, including the decision not to assert a defense of mental disease or defect (see People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 709, 530 N.Y.S.2d 52, 525 N.E.2d 698 [1988] ; People v. Love, 57 N.Y.2d 998, 457 N.Y.S.2d 238, 443 N.E.2d 486 [1982] ). Accordingly, because defendant has not made a CPL 440.10 motion, the merits of the ineffectiveness claims may not be addressed on appeal. In the alternative, to the extent the existing record permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713–714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 [1998] ; Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 [1984] ).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Shutsha

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 23, 2021
199 A.D.3d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Shutsha

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sekou SHUTSHA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 23, 2021

Citations

199 A.D.3d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
154 N.Y.S.3d 752

Citing Cases

People v. Shutsha

Disposition: Applications for Criminal Leave to appeal denied Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 199 A.D.3d…