From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shulman

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2006
14 Misc. 3d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In People v. Shulman, 14 Misc 3d 129(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 52508(U), 836 N.Y.S.2d 488 (2006), the case also referenced by the sponsors of the proposed legislation discussed hereinafter, the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second Department, held that two instances of a vehicle crossing "a solid white line which separated his lane of traffic from the paved shoulder of the road" was not a traffic infraction. "The crossing of a solid white line is discouraged, but not prohibited (see 17 NYCRR §§ 261.2, 261.5[c]; § 261.7[a])" (Shulman at 489)

Summary of this case from People v. Kern
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

No. 2006-605 D CR.

December 19, 2006.

Motor Vehicles — Traffic Infractions. Vehicle and Traffic Law — § 1128 (d) (Driving on roadways laned for traffic).

Summaries of

People v. Shulman

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2006
14 Misc. 3d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

In People v. Shulman, 14 Misc 3d 129(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 52508(U), 836 N.Y.S.2d 488 (2006), the case also referenced by the sponsors of the proposed legislation discussed hereinafter, the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second Department, held that two instances of a vehicle crossing "a solid white line which separated his lane of traffic from the paved shoulder of the road" was not a traffic infraction. "The crossing of a solid white line is discouraged, but not prohibited (see 17 NYCRR §§ 261.2, 261.5[c]; § 261.7[a])" (Shulman at 489)

Summary of this case from People v. Kern

In People v. Shulman, 14 Misc.3d 129(A), 2006 N.Y. Slip Op 52508(U), 836 N.Y.S.2d 488 (2006), the case also referenced by the sponsors of the proposed legislation discussed hereinafter, the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second Department, held that two instances of a vehicle crossing “a solid white line which separated his lane of traffic from the paved shoulder of the road” was not a traffic infraction. “The crossing of a solid white line is discouraged, but not prohibited (see 17 NYCRR §§ 261.2, 261.5[c]; § 261.7 [a])” (Shulman at 489)

Summary of this case from People v. Kern

In People v. Shulman, 14 Misc.3d 129(A), 2006 WL 3858337 (2006), the Appellate Term reversed a conviction for violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law section 1128(d) by crossing over the solid white shoulder line two times.

Summary of this case from People v. Luster

In People v. Shulman, 14 Misc 3d 129A, 836 NYS2d 488 [Table], 2006 WL 3858337, 2006 NY Slip Op. 52508[U]), the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, Second Department, held that two instances of a vehicle crossing "a solid white line which separated his lane of traffic from the paved shoulder of the road" was not a traffic infraction.

Summary of this case from People v. Bordeau
Case details for

People v. Shulman

Case Details

Full title:People v. Shulman (Burt)

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2006

Citations

14 Misc. 3d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 52508

Citing Cases

People v. Kern

(d) When official markings are in place indicating those portions of any roadway where crossing such markings…

People v. Kern

(d) When official markings are in place indicating those portions of any roadway where crossing such markings…

11 Citing Cases