From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1999
265 A.D.2d 184 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 7, 1999

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, J.), rendered February 19, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.


The suppression court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the pre-recorded buy money and identification. Defendant's argument that the People failed to meet their burden as to probable cause because the arresting officer was not asked to define the term "positive buy" is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the arresting officer's testimony was sufficient to establish probable cause (see, People v. Maldonado, 86 N.Y.2d 631), and that there was no need for the officer to explain to the court the meaning of the phrase, "positive buy", since that phrase has a recognized and accepted meaning in law enforcement (See People v. Acevedo, 179 A.D.2d 465, 467, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 996).

ROSENBERGER, J.P., TOM, MAZZARELLI, LERNER, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Shomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1999
265 A.D.2d 184 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Shomo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondents v. KARL SHOMO, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 184 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 674

Citing Cases

People v. Starks

We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments concerning the sufficiency and weight of the…