From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sholar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2006
27 A.D.3d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-10103.

March 7, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered November 8, 2004, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon his admission that he had violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

Greg T. Rinckey, Albany, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v. California, 386 US 738; People v. Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v. Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).


Summaries of

People v. Sholar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2006
27 A.D.3d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Sholar

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES SHOLAR, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 7, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1660
810 N.Y.S.2d 344