From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shields

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 16, 1995
212 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 16, 1995

Appeal from the County Court of Broome County (Ray, J.).


In support of his application to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant asserts that the judgment was procured through fraud, duress and/or misrepresentation, and that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. With respect to defendant's first contention, we find that the record filed in connection with defendant's prior appeal was sufficiently complete to permit review of the claims raised by defendant in the instant case. Since he failed to raise these claims in the prior appeal, he is precluded from raising them now. Moreover, the record does not support defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. In view of the foregoing, County Court properly denied defendant's CPL 440.10 motion.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Shields

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 16, 1995
212 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Shields

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STANLEY N. SHIELDS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 16, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 169