Opinion
November 25, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J., at hearing; Nicholas Figueroa, J., at jury trial and sentencing).
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. There was ample evidence establishing probable cause for defendant's arrest, including an exchange of money for unseen objects taken out of a plastic bag, recognized by the experienced observing officer to be a drug transaction ( see, People v. Jones, 90 N.Y.2d 835), and the fact that, prior to arresting defendant, the police learned that drugs had been recovered from defendant's purchaser shortly after the transaction with defendant took place.
By failing to request further relief after appropriate curative action by the court, defendant has not preserved his current claim that the People's summation denied him a fair trial, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that the challenged portions of the People's summation do not warrant reversal ( see, People v D'Alesandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884). Defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved and without merit.
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Williams and Colabella, JJ.