From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 27, 2015
497 Mich. 1025 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 150674. COA No. 317800.

05-27-2015

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Shaquille Joel SHERMAN, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals opinion suggesting that a “completed larceny” is an element of unlawfully driving away a motor vehicle (UDAA). This Court expressly rejected that conclusion in People v. Cain, 495 Mich. 874, 838 N.W.2d 150 (2013). We otherwise AFFIRM the Court of Appeals holding that defendant's multiple punishments for carjacking and UDAA do not violate his double jeopardy rights, for the reasons set forth in Cain. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

People v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 27, 2015
497 Mich. 1025 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Shaquille Joel…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 27, 2015

Citations

497 Mich. 1025 (Mich. 2015)
863 N.W.2d 42

Citing Cases

Sherman v. Horton

The Michigan Supreme Court vacated the part of the Michigan Court of Appeals' opinion "suggesting that a…