From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sheppard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1992
186 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 5, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lakritz, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The court's Sandoval ruling that the defendant could be impeached by his previous robbery convictions was not an improvident exercise of its discretion (see, People v Mackey, 49 N.Y.2d 274, 281; People v Ellis, 162 A.D.2d 611; People v Woods, 158 A.D.2d 566; People v Branch, 155 A.D.2d 475).

The defendant challenged the admissibility of a videotaped statement on voluntariness grounds alone, and his decision to proceed to trial without objecting to its narrative of uncharged crimes amounts to a failure to preserve the issue of the admissibility of evidence of uncharged crimes for appellate review. Mangano, P.J., Harwood, Miller and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sheppard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 1992
186 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Sheppard

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD SHEPPARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Pergya

The defendant's contention that the trial court erred in allowing the People to elicit testimony from an…

People v. Perez

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that the admission into evidence of certain…