Opinion
April 15, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lane, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant's claims regarding the sufficiency of the plea allocution are unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05; People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. Mattocks, 100 A.D.2d 944). Moreover, reversal is not warranted in the interest of justice because the record of the allocution establishes that defendant knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty ( see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v. New York, 393 U.S. 1067).
Finally, we perceive no basis for concluding that the sentence imposed, which was the product of a negotiated plea, warrants modification in the interest of justice ( People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Titone, J.P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.