From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shelmandine

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 14, 2015
128 A.D.3d 1180 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

105804

05-14-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shawn SHELMANDINE, Appellant.

Kelly M. Monroe, Albany, for appellant. P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Vincent Stark of counsel), for respondent.


Kelly M. Monroe, Albany, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Vincent Stark of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered February 1, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the third degree. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he was permitted to participate in the drug court program and was advised that, if he successfully completed it, he would be allowed to withdraw his plea, plead guilty to petit larceny and be sentenced to time served. Defendant was further advised that, if he did not successfully complete the drug court program, he would be sentenced as a nonviolent predicate felony offender to a prison term ranging from a maximum of 3 ½ to 7 years to a minimum of 2 to 4 years. Defendant did not successfully complete the drug court program and was sentenced to 2 to 4 years in prison. He now appeals.

Defendant's sole contention is that County Court violated CPL 400.21 by failing to provide him with a copy of his predicate felony offender statement prior to sentencing him. However, given that he failed to raise an appropriate objection at sentencing, he has not preserved this claim for our review (see People v. House, 119 A.D.3d 1289, 1290, 989 N.Y.S.2d 919 [2014] ; People v. Morse, 111 A.D.3d 1161, 1161, 975 N.Y.S.2d 496 [2013], lv. denied 23 N.Y.3d 1040, 993 N.Y.S.2d 254, 17 N.E.3d 509 [2014] ). In any event, upon reviewing the record, we find that there was substantial compliance with the statutory requirement (see People v. House, 119 A.D.3d at 1290, 989 N.Y.S.2d 919 ; People v. Walton, 101 A.D.3d 1489, 1490, 956 N.Y.S.2d 705 [2012], lv. denied 20 N.Y.3d 1105, 965 N.Y.S.2d 801, 988 N.E.2d 539 [2013] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

PETERS, P.J., McCARTHY, EGAN JR. and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Shelmandine

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 14, 2015
128 A.D.3d 1180 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Shelmandine

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHAWN SHELMANDINE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 14, 2015

Citations

128 A.D.3d 1180 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
9 N.Y.S.3d 891
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 4172

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

r our review for lack of an appropriate postallocution motion (see People v. Cox, 146 A.D.3d 1154, 1154–1155,…

People v. Williams

To the extent that defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim involves matters outside of the…