From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sharma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 2007
36 A.D.3d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2001-10936.

January 16, 2007.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered November 15, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Theodore W. Robinson, P.C., Mineola, N.Y., for appellant.

Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley and Cristin N. Connell of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Lunn and Angiolillo, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to perform the investigation needed to obtain and present evidence that the victim's death was the result of medical malpractice, not the stab wound to his head inflicted by the defendant, is not reviewable on direct appeal because it is based on matter dehors the record ( see People v Rivera, 33 AD3d 942; People v Whitaker, 27 AD3d 499). On the record before this Court, the defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel ( see People v Rivera, supra).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Sharma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 2007
36 A.D.3d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Sharma

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PRATEEK SHARMA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 16, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 335
831 N.Y.S.2d 177

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

The remaining contention raised in the defendant's main brief has been rendered academic by our…

People v. Thomas

The remaining contention raised in the defendant's main brief has been rendered academic by our…