From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 1995
222 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.).


Defendant's claim that his identification was the product of an unlawful arrest is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review, we would find that probable cause was provided by an identified, and presumably reliable, citizen-witness reporting a robbery and burglary. It is of no moment that the witness's information derived partly from his own observations and partly from the witness's conversation with the complainant, whose reliability is also presumed ( see, People v Parris, 83 N.Y.2d 342, 348-350; People v Johnson, 66 N.Y.2d 398, 402).

The court properly admitted the statement, "[w]e are Albanian, we kill for nothing" as relevant to the issues of identification in the unusual circumstances of this case and intent to place the witness in fear of immediate use of physical force ( see, Penal Law § 160.00). We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Defendant's remaining claims are largely unpreserved, and entirely without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Shala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 1995
222 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Shala

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NICK SHALA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 642