From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Seymore

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Aug 10, 2021
No. 357094 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2021)

Opinion

357094

08-10-2021

People of Michigan v. Tommie Lee Seymore


LC No. 90-008641-01-FC

Kirsten Frank Kelly Presiding Judge, Thomas C. Cameron, Anica Letica Judges

ORDER

The motion to hold the application in abeyance is DENIED as moot, the complaint in Docket No. 356376 having been dismissed.

The motion to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED.

In lieu of granting the delayed application, the Court orders, pursuant to MCR 7.205(E)(2), that the July 9, 2020 and November 4, 2020 orders of the Wayne Circuit Court denying defendant's motion for relief from judgment hereby are VACATED. We REMAND this case to the trial court to appoint counsel for defendant if necessary and for an evidentiary hearing on the defendant's motion for relief from judgment. The trial court must consider the newly discovered evidence in light of the evidence adduced at trial. People v Grissom, 492 Mich. 296, 321; 821 N.W.2d 50 (2012). The court must assess whether the testimony from the evidentiary hearing could be found credible by a reasonable juror to determine if the newly discovered evidence would make a different result probable on retrial. People v Johnson, 502 Mch 541, 567; 918 N.W.2d 676 (2018).

This order is to have immediate effect, MCR 7.215(F)(2).

The Court retains no further jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Seymore

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Aug 10, 2021
No. 357094 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Seymore

Case Details

Full title:People of Michigan v. Tommie Lee Seymore

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Aug 10, 2021

Citations

No. 357094 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2021)