From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Setteroth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 27, 1994
200 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 27, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.).


Defendant's constitutional right to present evidence at the Mapp hearing was not denied when the hearing court refused his request for a continuance so that he could call the officer who observed the "buy and bust" operation (the "ghost") which ultimately led to his arrest. The decision was properly within the court's discretion, there being no indication that the People "improperly withheld information concerning the existence of this witness or the nature of his potential testimony" (People v. Shepard, 162 A.D.2d 226, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 944). The request must be supported by a "bona fide factual predicate" demonstrating that the witness possessed material, noncumulative evidence (People v. Witherspoon, 66 N.Y.2d 973, 974). Such was not the case here since defense counsel merely conjectured that the testimony of the arresting officer differed from the events the "ghost" saw and communicated.

Defendant's claim that probable cause was not established at the suppression hearing since the "ghost" member of the "buy and bust" operation did not testify thereat is unpreserved for review, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review, we would find that "contrary to defendant's contention, the testimony of the ghost was unnecessary in view of the arresting officer's testimony that he relied on information from [the ghost] who personally observed the transaction" (People v. Hernandez, 189 A.D.2d 634, 635, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 971).

We have examined defendant's remaining contention and find it without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Setteroth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 27, 1994
200 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Setteroth

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY SETTEROTH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 15

Citing Cases

People v. Wearing

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request for a continuance to have the…

People v. Medina

Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given to inconsistencies in testimony, were properly…