Opinion
2002-1606 K CR.
Decided June 7, 2005.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Criminal Court, Kings County (D. Chun, J.), rendered September 26, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10) and imposing sentence.
Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed.
Before: PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., PATTERSON and BELEN, JJ.
As defendant received the sentence for which he bargained, he has no ground to complain that said sentence was excessive ( e.g. People v. Domin, 13 AD3d 391; People v. Fanelli, 8 AD3d 296; People v. Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). In any event, the sentence did not constitute an abuse of sentencing discretion, nor should the sentence be modified in the interest of justice. In our view, defendant's prior conviction of a more serious offense of a similar nature and the salutatory conditions of his probation render the instant sentence entirely appropriate ( People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).