From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Serrano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 2003
304 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

666, 666A

April 1, 2003.

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward Davidowitz, J.), rendered on or about January 10, 2000, unanimously affirmed.

Bonnie B. Goldburg, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Friedman, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant's assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Serrano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 2003
304 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Serrano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FELIPE SERRANO, a/k/a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 745

Citing Cases

Lopez v. Allied Amusement Shows, Inc.

Eyewitness' affidavit was replete with facts inconsistent with plaintiff's prior testimony and court found…