From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Serrano

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 28, 2018
166 A.D.3d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2014–07922 Ind. No. 6664/12

11-28-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Gilberto SERRANO, Appellant.

The Legal Aid Society, New York, N.Y. (Jeffrey Dellheim of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), for respondent.


The Legal Aid Society, New York, N.Y. (Jeffrey Dellheim of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., MARK C. DILLON, JEFFREY A. COHEN, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vincent M. Del Giudice, J.), rendered July 29, 2014, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

In the early morning hours of July 14, 2012, the defendant and the codefendant stabbed and killed a person (hereinafter the victim) outside a bar in Bensonhurst. Two taxi drivers, who were each parked nearby in their respective vehicles, witnessed the stabbing and called 911. The defendant and the codefendant were subsequently charged and, following a jury trial at which the taxi drivers testified, both were convicted of murder in the second degree. The defendant appeals.

The defendant correctly contends that the Supreme Court should not have allowed the People to elicit testimony from one of the taxi drivers that, while he was testifying, he felt intimidated by a courtroom spectator who was a member of the defendant's gang (cf. People v. Kims, 24 N.Y.3d 422, 438, 999 N.Y.S.2d 337, 24 N.E.3d 573 ; People v. Guerrero, 150 A.D.3d 883, 885, 55 N.Y.S.3d 67 ; see generally People v. Aska, 91 N.Y.2d 979, 981, 674 N.Y.S.2d 271, 697 N.E.2d 172 ). However, this error was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, and no significant probability that the alleged error contributed to his conviction (see People v. Grant, 7 N.Y.3d 421, 423, 823 N.Y.S.2d 757, 857 N.E.2d 52 ; People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 326 N.E.2d 787 ; People v. Williams, 56 A.D.3d 699, 699, 873 N.Y.S.2d 71 ).

RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, COHEN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Serrano

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 28, 2018
166 A.D.3d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Serrano

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Gilberto Serrano…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Nov 28, 2018

Citations

166 A.D.3d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 8155
86 N.Y.S.3d 732

Citing Cases

People v. Juarez

The defendant appeals.The defendant correctly contends that the Supreme Court should not have allowed the…

People v. Bedard

Defendant has not demonstrated that the prejudicial effect of the admission of the fact of this single prior…