From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. SELG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1985
110 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 29, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.).


Judgments affirmed.

The decision to grant or deny a youthful offender application is a discretionary one ( see, People v. Parris, 109 A.D.2d 853), and here there was no abuse of discretion in denying defendant's application for that relief.

As to defendant's contention that the court erred in accepting his pleas, that issue was not preserved for appellate review because of defendant's failure to raise it at Criminal Term ( see, People v. Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858). Titone, J.P., Lazer, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. SELG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1985
110 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. SELG

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK SELG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Any possible prejudice created by the prosecutor's summation was cured by the court's curative instructions…

People v. Williams

The defense counsel affirmatively asserted at sentencing on the instant conviction that neither the defendant…