From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Seifert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1991
173 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

May 20, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the minimum term of the sentence imposed from 4 years to 2 2/3 years imprisonment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree based on Penal Law 160.15 (3) ("[u]ses or threatens the immediate use of a dangerous instrument") and was sentenced as a first felony offender to a term of imprisonment of four to eight years. Since, as the People concede, the defendant was not convicted of an armed felony offense (see, CPL 1.20), the minimum term of imprisonment should have been one-third of the maximum term, rather than one-half the maximum term (see, People v Ulses, 132 A.D.2d 584; People v Thorpe, 129 A.D.2d 822; Penal Law § 70.02). The maximum term of imprisonment of eight years imposed upon the defendant was proper. Accordingly, the minimum term of his sentence has been modified to the extent indicated.

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be largely unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Charleston, 56 N.Y.2d 886; People v Young, 48 N.Y.2d 995). To the extent that they are preserved, we find them to be without merit. Kunzeman, J.P., Sullivan, Lawrence and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Seifert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1991
173 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Seifert

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL SEIFERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Pena

As conceded by the People, the court erred in imposing a minimum of one-half of the maximum term, inasmuch as…

People v. Flores

The defendant contends, and the People concede, that the court erroneously imposed a sentence of 12 1/2 to…